 |
 |
| Justice
Not War - Press Releases |
|






|
March
19th, Justice Not War Condemns Unethical War Against Iraq
|
Press
Release:
For Immediate Release
3/19/03
Contact:
The Justice Not War Coalition
phone: 541-343-8548
e-mail: jnotwar@efn.org
The Justice Not War Coalition condemns this unethical, illegal,
hypocritical war - war that makes this world a more dangerous
place. To kill thousands or tens of thousands of innocent
people, mostly children, to drive millions of people from
their homes, and to risk a grave humanitarian crisis in
a nation already widely dependent on food aid is unconscionable.
Jennifer Knowlton of the Justice Not War steering committee
said, "While most of the world supports continued diplomacy
and inspections, the Bush administration has chosen the
immoral path of killing thousands of children and other
innocent civilians." The Bush administration has failed
to make a convincing case for war. It has stooped to the
use of bribery, spying, threats, and manufactured evidence.
In spite of all of this, it has failed to gain the support
of nine members of the U.N. Security Council. World opinion
remains strongly in opposition to the Bush war.
The
war is illegal because it is the responsibility of the U.N.
Security Council to determine what actions shall be taken
in response to a threat to the peace, breach of the peace,
or act of aggression (see Articles 39 and 42 of the U.N.
Charter). The only exception is in a case of self-defense
in response to an attack (Article 51). Yet Iraq has not
attacked the United States, and not even the Bush administration
has argued that there is a threat of imminent attack.
In
the United States, we believe in a system of checks and
balances. Yet when the United Nations fails to submit to
the will of the Bush administration, Bush suggests that
the U.N. risks irrelevance. The Supreme Court did not appoint
Bush to the post of ruler of the world.
U.N. Resolution 1441, which was unanimously adopted by the
Security Council, calls for Saddam Hussein to disarm. But
for the Bush administration to claim that it authorizes
war is a bald-faced lie. As Keir Starmer put it (The Guardian,
March 17): "The argument that all the security council
members, including France and Russia, intended to authorize
the use of force when they voted for resolution 1441 is
hardly compelling, and arguments that resolution 1441 implicitly
authorises the use of force run into the same difficulty."
The
Bush administration appears to be grasping at straws. Bush
has claimed that war is authorized by resolutions 678 and
687, adopted by the Security Council in the context of the
first Gulf War. Yet 687 does not authorize the use of force,
and 678 authorized the use of force only for the purpose
of restoring Kuwait's sovereignty.
Not
only is this war illegal, but for the Bush administration
to initiate an aggressive war on the basis of concerns about
weapons of mass destruction is hypocritcal. Every five years
since 1970, the U.S. has renewed its NPT commitment to eliminate
its nuclear arsenal. Yet we still have nuclear weapons,
thousands of which are on hair-trigger alert. The Bush administration
is engaged in contingency planning for the use of nuclear
weapons against Iraq (which would be in violation of international
law, according to the World Court's July 8, 1996 advisory
opinion). The Bush administration has also increased funding
for "bio-defense," which includes funding of research
for biotech applications for bio-weapons. This research
is likely to launch a bio-weapons arms race (see the Bulletin
of the Atomic Scientists - the September/October 1996 issue
for commentary on the World Court advisory opinion, and
recent issues for commentary on U.S. bio-weapons research).
This war and the following military occupation of Iraq may
lead to prolonged instability in Iraq, to a rise in anti-Americanism
and increased terrorist recruitment, to continued economic
decline in the United States, and to dramatically impaired
diplomatic relations, in turn making it more difficult to
work with other nations to reduce terrorism and to address
other serious international problems.
The Bush administration's $459 billion military budget,
in addition to the tens or hundreds of billions of dollars
which will go toward war on Iraq and the following military
occupation, threatens to break the economy. The War Resisters
League presents some comparisons: for $14,000 you can enroll
two children in Head Start, or buy a cluster bomb; for $46
million you can improve, repair, and modernize 20 schools,
or support one hour of war in Iraq. At a time when schools
are receiving devastating cuts, and people are being dropped
from the Oregon Health Plan, we must question the priorities
of an administration set on war.
There
is a road to peace, and to freedom from the scourge of terrorism.
Among other steps, this would require working together with
other nations in an atmosphere of mutual respect; listening
to the legitimate concerns of people in the Middle East
and around the world; and meeting the U.N. target by allocating
1% of the U.S. GDP for foreign aid to address basic needs
of people lacking food, clean water, shelter, medical care,
or opportunities for education. The U.S. currently allocates
1/10th of 1%, and most of this goes to Israel and Egypt.
In the words of historian Howard Zinn:
"The modest nations of the world don't face the threat
of terrorism. Let us pull back from being a military superpower
and become a humanitarian superpower."
The
Justice Not War Coalition is a community response to the
events of September 11th, 2001 and the subsequent military
actions. The coalition sponsors and organizes activities
including marches, rallies, teach-ins, conferences, planning
meetings, and peace vigils. When the coalition was formed,
it agreed to the following purposes: 1. organize and promote
community action for global peace and justice; 2. educate
ourselves and our community about peaceful alternatives
too war; 3. resist suppression of liberty in the name of
security; 4. speak out and act against policies and actions
that target people for their racial, ethnic, cultural, and/or
religious identity. Coalition members include: the Center
for the Advancement of Liberty, the Committee in Solidarity
with the Central American People, the Community Alliance
of Lane County/Progressive Responses, Community-wide Nonviolence
Training, the Eugene Middle East Peace Group, Eugene PeaceWorks,
the Fair Trade Coalition, Faith in Action, the Independent
Police Review Project, Inform Productions and Radio, Lane
Conversation Cafes, the Lane County Bill of Rights Defense
Committee, Military Tax Resisters, Million Mom March, Neighborhhoods
for Peace, the Nonviolence Alliance, the Northwest Project
of the Institute for Public Accountability, Oregon PeaceWorks,
the Pacific Green Party, Peace Monitor Program and Training,
the Socialist Party of Oregon - Lane County Chapter, Students
for Peace, Urgent Carnival, and Women's Action for New Directions.
|
President
Bush's March 17th Speech & JNW Coalition's Response
|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March
18, 2003
Contact:
Justice Not War Coalition
phone:
541-343-8548
e-mail: jnotwar@efn.org
RESPONSE
TO GEORGE W. BUSHS RENEWED
THREATS AGAINST IRAQ
George
W. Bush calls his March 17 speech Iraq: Denial and
Deception, and
he is absolutely correct. Mr. Bush is practicing both denial
and deception
as he attempts to mislead the American people about illegality
of war, and
its effects on the Iraqi people.
Not
only are multitudes of people throughout the world opposed
to the United
States unilaterally attacking Iraq, but Mr. Bush has failed
to secure the
support of the United Nations Security Council. Articles
39 and 42
specify that only the Security Council may determine what
course of action
is to be taken if there is a threat to the peace. Article
51 lays out the
one exception: there is a sovereign right to self-defense
in response to
an attack. Yet Iraq has not attacked the United States and
there is not an
immiment threat of such an attack.
Bush
maintains that war is authorized by UN Resolution 1441.
But as Keir
Starmer writes in The Guardian (March 17): "The argument
that all the
security council members, including France and Russia, intended
to
authorise the use of force when they voted for resolution
1441 is
hardly compelling...." Similarly, resolution 687 does
not authorise the
use of force, and 678 authorised the use of force only to
restore
Kuwait's sovereignty, following the 1990 invasion by Iraq.
It appears that
Mr. Bush is grasping at straws, looking for any excuse to
attack, and
doing so without any regard for the truth whatsoever.
Mr. Bush ignores the fact that nearly half the American
population opposes
war. According to the Associated Press, 13 percent oppose
the war in all
circumstances, and 37 percent are opposed because there
is no UN Security
Council resolution. Thats a total of 50 percent of
the American population
with extreme misgivings about attack on Iraq. Though Mr.
Bush may talk
about a coalition that has formed to remove
the evil Saddam, the truth
is the countries in coalition besides Great Britain, are
those bribed and
intimated to be there.
It
would be laughable, if it werent so tragic to hear
Mr. Bush speaking to
the Iraqi people, trying to make it sound plausible that
American bombs will
hit only the lawless people in Iraq and leave the innocent
unharmed. The
fact is, thousands, if not tens of thousands of Iraqis
most of them
children will be killed by American firepower in
order to accomplish the
regime change that Mr. Bush insists must take place to restore
order in the
world. According to a UN document for the planning of humanitarian
relief,
the expected outcomes of a US campaign of bombing and invasion
includes:
-
500,000 civilian casualties,
-
2,000,000 people homeless,
-
10,000,000 people without enough to eat,
-
18,000,000 without access to clean water, and
-
more than 1,000,000 children under the age of 5, at risk
of death from malnutrition.
It
is Mr. Bush who is lawless. It is Mr. Bush who has upset
order in the
world. It is Mr. Bush who is terrorizing Iraqi people with
his plans for
war. It is Mr. Bush who has transformed this American democracy
into a
rogue nation, willing to impose its will on the rest of
the world.
The
American people will not stand by while these denials and
deceptions are
uttered by the White House. In thousands of cities across
the nation,
including Eugene, ordinary citizens will take to the streets
in the days to
come, continuing to show Mr. Bush and the world that we
do not support
attacking another country with no provocation. We will not
turn a blind eye
while Mr. Bush attempts to practice his denial and deception
on us all.
|
The
March 15th, 2003 Peace Rally & Unwarranted Police Responses
Press
Release
For Immediate Release
March 18, 2003
Contact:
Justice Not War Coalition, Steering Committee o. 343-8548
Amy Pincus Merwin o. 345-1633; cp 521-5062
Press
Conference Scheduled to explore Eugene Police actions for
Wednesday, March 19, 2003, 10am at the Eugene City office
complex, Oak St. entrance stairs.
March
15th Peace Rally turned violent due to Eugene Police actions
Saturday,
March 15, 2003 began with 5,000 or more Eugene and Lane County
citizens marched peacefully in an unpermitted march from the
UO's EMU to a permitted rally at the US Federal Courthouse
on the corner of 7th and Pearl St.
The
permitted rally, scheduled to occur between 1-5pm, focused
on "A Celebration of Life" in opposition to the
imminent war on Iraq, flowed smoothly for one and a half hours
despite difficult weather conditions. Music buoyed the protesters
moods, while speakers from community groups informed people
as how to get involved to stop the war and support our community.
The
large mass of people spilled over into 7th and Pearl streets
from the Federal Courthouse Plaza, but the police and Eugene
Department of Public Works had closed off the blocks between
High and Oak on 7th St. as a matter of their own choice, without
either requests or input from rally organizers. As a matter
of fact, those blocks remained closed before, during and after
the March 15th march and rally.
At
approximately 2:30pm a small group of approximately 100 people,
who remained at the rally after several downpours, began to
walk. Neither these walkers intent, nor their destination
was ever delineated. According to many citizen observers,
the Eugene Police suddenly and shockingly drove five to six
vehicles into the west section of the 7th and Pearl intersection
with their sirens blaring and their lights flashing. At the
same time many people who had been in the street block section
of 7th between Pearl and High as a part of the rally were
caught between police vehicles on the west end of the block
and an EPD cordon on the east end of the same block.
According
to citizen accounts, the EPD began amplifying their message
to disperse which was inaudible to the protesters due to the
weather, and the music and speakers from the stage. In fact,
one of the rally organizers and MC, from UO Students for Peace,
was called by the EPD, but could not answer her phone because
she was too busy reacting to the incident unfolding before
her. Another rally organizer and MC, from UO Students for
Peace was approached by an Eugene Police Officer and told
that the Eugene Police wanted the rally stopped and shut-down
and made a reference to the possible use of tear gas.
Then
the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team arrived
in full riot gear and began to approach protesters still in
the street. In contradiction to the EPD press release dated
3/15/03, no "admonishments were made by people associated
with the rally to exit the streets with their PA system"
to the rally attendees, nor was "the initial rally over."
The rally was scheduled to continue until 5pm with a legal
permit.
Once
the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team appeared
on the scene, as witnessed from a citizens' video of the event,
people who had been in the streets as a part of the rally
began to react to the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control
Team's very intense presence by staying in the streets. Subsequently,
Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team began without
provocation to shoot beanbags at protesters, and wave their
weapons at people in the crowd who were in shock, including
parents with young children, seniors and youth, and people
standing just off the sidewalk. Then the crowd began to react
even more to the provocation of the Eugene Police Department's
Crowd Control Team and several young people between the ages
of 15- and 21-years old, clasped hands and sat down in the
street. These seven people were arrested, removed from the
scene, taken several blocks away where they were told to sit
in wet areas (and subsequently became soaked), ticketed, and
relea
sed.
Representatives
from the Eugene Police Department met with the Peacekeepers
on Sunday, March 16 and again on Monday, March 17, 2003. Several
participants have reported that: 1) the EPD representatives
told them that the EPD was understaffed; 2) they chose to
demonstrate a 'use of force' in order to shock, awe and control
the crowd; 3) the outcome was not their intended not desired
outcome; 4) that they were concerned about the bridges being
filled with marchers; and 4) they have come close to admitting
that they over-reacted to the events on March 15th.
Ironically,
on both February 15, and March 15, 2003 the EPD chose to act
aggressively toward protesters because of their assumption
that protesters were heading to and would attempt to close
down the Washington/Jefferson Bridge and the Ferry St. Bridge
respectively. There is not any indication that on either days
of protest that protesters intended to close down any bridges
in Eugene.
It
is clear from both the citizen video and citizen accounts
that the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team acted
aggressively, aggravating a peaceful situation, scaring law-abiding
citizens, attempting to shut-down a lawful and permitted 'right
of assembly' event, provoking a reaction from the crowd who
for all extensive purposes thought the street was closed off
for the purpose of the march and rally, injured innocent people
with the 'use of force' by shooting bean bags at individuals,
and evoked all the subsequent problems, including reinforcing
an image that Eugene's protest events are violent.
Justice
Not War Coalition condemns the Eugene Police Department's
decisions and actions on March 15, 2003 and will pursue making
formal complaints to the Eugene Human Rights Commission, Eugene
Police Commission, and the Eugene City Council.
Please
contact the Justice Not War Coalition with any further questions
or inquiries.
|
|
|
Justice Not War Coalition
30 East Broadway
Suite # 151
Eugene, OR 97401
541-521-0596
jnotwar@efn.org
To
volunteer, contact Rich: 541-521-0596 / volunteer@justicenotwarcoalition.org
|
"In
no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law ... That
would lead to anarchy. An individual who breaks a law that
his conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts
the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience
of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing
the highest respect for law."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|