Justice Not War - Press Releases

coalition membership
events
resources
peace links on the web






 

 


March 19th, Justice Not War Condemns Unethical War Against Iraq

Press Release:
For Immediate Release
3/19/03

Contact: The Justice Not War Coalition
phone: 541-343-8548
e-mail: jnotwar@efn.org


The Justice Not War Coalition condemns this unethical, illegal, hypocritical war - war that makes this world a more dangerous place. To kill thousands or tens of thousands of innocent people, mostly children, to drive millions of people from their homes, and to risk a grave humanitarian crisis in a nation already widely dependent on food aid is unconscionable. Jennifer Knowlton of the Justice Not War steering committee said, "While most of the world supports continued diplomacy and inspections, the Bush administration has chosen the immoral path of killing thousands of children and other innocent civilians." The Bush administration has failed to make a convincing case for war. It has stooped to the use of bribery, spying, threats, and manufactured evidence. In spite of all of this, it has failed to gain the support of nine members of the U.N. Security Council. World opinion remains strongly in opposition to the Bush war.

The war is illegal because it is the responsibility of the U.N. Security Council to determine what actions shall be taken in response to a threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression (see Articles 39 and 42 of the U.N. Charter). The only exception is in a case of self-defense in response to an attack (Article 51). Yet Iraq has not attacked the United States, and not even the Bush administration has argued that there is a threat of imminent attack.

In the United States, we believe in a system of checks and balances. Yet when the United Nations fails to submit to the will of the Bush administration, Bush suggests that the U.N. risks irrelevance. The Supreme Court did not appoint Bush to the post of ruler of the world.
U.N. Resolution 1441, which was unanimously adopted by the Security Council, calls for Saddam Hussein to disarm. But for the Bush administration to claim that it authorizes war is a bald-faced lie. As Keir Starmer put it (The Guardian, March 17): "The argument that all the security council members, including France and Russia, intended to authorize the use of force when they voted for resolution 1441 is hardly compelling, and arguments that resolution 1441 implicitly authorises the use of force run into the same difficulty."

The Bush administration appears to be grasping at straws. Bush has claimed that war is authorized by resolutions 678 and 687, adopted by the Security Council in the context of the first Gulf War. Yet 687 does not authorize the use of force, and 678 authorized the use of force only for the purpose of restoring Kuwait's sovereignty.

Not only is this war illegal, but for the Bush administration to initiate an aggressive war on the basis of concerns about weapons of mass destruction is hypocritcal. Every five years since 1970, the U.S. has renewed its NPT commitment to eliminate its nuclear arsenal. Yet we still have nuclear weapons, thousands of which are on hair-trigger alert. The Bush administration is engaged in contingency planning for the use of nuclear weapons against Iraq (which would be in violation of international
law, according to the World Court's July 8, 1996 advisory opinion). The Bush administration has also increased funding for "bio-defense," which includes funding of research for biotech applications for bio-weapons. This research is likely to launch a bio-weapons arms race (see the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - the September/October 1996 issue for commentary on the World Court advisory opinion, and recent issues for commentary on U.S. bio-weapons research).
This war and the following military occupation of Iraq may lead to prolonged instability in Iraq, to a rise in anti-Americanism and increased terrorist recruitment, to continued economic decline in the United States, and to dramatically impaired diplomatic relations, in turn making it more difficult to work with other nations to reduce terrorism and to address other serious international problems.
The Bush administration's $459 billion military budget, in addition to the tens or hundreds of billions of dollars which will go toward war on Iraq and the following military occupation, threatens to break the economy. The War Resisters League presents some comparisons: for $14,000 you can enroll two children in Head Start, or buy a cluster bomb; for $46 million you can improve, repair, and modernize 20 schools, or support one hour of war in Iraq. At a time when schools are receiving devastating cuts, and people are being dropped from the Oregon Health Plan, we must question the priorities of an administration set on war.

There is a road to peace, and to freedom from the scourge of terrorism. Among other steps, this would require working together with other nations in an atmosphere of mutual respect; listening to the legitimate concerns of people in the Middle East and around the world; and meeting the U.N. target by allocating 1% of the U.S. GDP for foreign aid to address basic needs of people lacking food, clean water, shelter, medical care, or opportunities for education. The U.S. currently allocates 1/10th of 1%, and most of this goes to Israel and Egypt. In the words of historian Howard Zinn:
"The modest nations of the world don't face the threat of terrorism. Let us pull back from being a military superpower and become a humanitarian superpower."

The Justice Not War Coalition is a community response to the events of September 11th, 2001 and the subsequent military actions. The coalition sponsors and organizes activities including marches, rallies, teach-ins, conferences, planning meetings, and peace vigils. When the coalition was formed, it agreed to the following purposes: 1. organize and promote community action for global peace and justice; 2. educate ourselves and our community about peaceful alternatives too war; 3. resist suppression of liberty in the name of security; 4. speak out and act against policies and actions that target people for their racial, ethnic, cultural, and/or religious identity. Coalition members include: the Center for the Advancement of Liberty, the Committee in Solidarity with the Central American People, the Community Alliance of Lane County/Progressive Responses, Community-wide Nonviolence Training, the Eugene Middle East Peace Group, Eugene PeaceWorks, the Fair Trade Coalition, Faith in Action, the Independent Police Review Project, Inform Productions and Radio, Lane
Conversation Cafes, the Lane County Bill of Rights Defense Committee, Military Tax Resisters, Million Mom March, Neighborhhoods for Peace, the Nonviolence Alliance, the Northwest Project of the Institute for Public Accountability, Oregon PeaceWorks, the Pacific Green Party, Peace Monitor Program and Training, the Socialist Party of Oregon - Lane County Chapter, Students for Peace, Urgent Carnival, and Women's Action for New Directions.

 

President Bush's March 17th Speech & JNW Coalition's Response

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 18, 2003

Contact: Justice Not War Coalition
phone: 541-343-8548
e-mail: jnotwar@efn.org

RESPONSE TO GEORGE W. BUSH’S RENEWED THREATS AGAINST IRAQ

George W. Bush calls his March 17 speech “Iraq: Denial and Deception,” and
he is absolutely correct. Mr. Bush is practicing both denial and deception
as he attempts to mislead the American people about illegality of war, and
its effects on the Iraqi people.

Not only are multitudes of people throughout the world opposed to the United
States unilaterally attacking Iraq, but Mr. Bush has failed to secure the
support of the United Nations Security Council. Articles 39 and 42
specify that only the Security Council may determine what course of action
is to be taken if there is a threat to the peace. Article 51 lays out the
one exception: there is a sovereign right to self-defense in response to
an attack. Yet Iraq has not attacked the United States and there is not an
immiment threat of such an attack.

Bush maintains that war is authorized by UN Resolution 1441. But as Keir
Starmer writes in The Guardian (March 17): "The argument that all the
security council members, including France and Russia, intended to
authorise the use of force when they voted for resolution 1441 is
hardly compelling...." Similarly, resolution 687 does not authorise the
use of force, and 678 authorised the use of force only to restore
Kuwait's sovereignty, following the 1990 invasion by Iraq. It appears that
Mr. Bush is grasping at straws, looking for any excuse to attack, and
doing so without any regard for the truth whatsoever.


Mr. Bush ignores the fact that nearly half the American population opposes
war. According to the Associated Press, 13 percent oppose the war in all
circumstances, and 37 percent are opposed because there is no UN Security
Council resolution. That’s a total of 50 percent of the American population
with extreme misgivings about attack on Iraq. Though Mr. Bush may talk
about a “coalition” that has formed to remove the “evil Saddam,” the truth
is the countries in coalition besides Great Britain, are those bribed and
intimated to be there.

It would be laughable, if it weren’t so tragic to hear Mr. Bush speaking to
the Iraqi people, trying to make it sound plausible that American bombs will
hit only the lawless people in Iraq and leave the innocent unharmed. The
fact is, thousands, if not tens of thousands of Iraqis – most of them
children – will be killed by American firepower in order to accomplish the
regime change that Mr. Bush insists must take place to restore order in the
world. According to a UN document for the planning of humanitarian relief,
the expected outcomes of a US campaign of bombing and invasion includes:

- 500,000 civilian casualties,

- 2,000,000 people homeless,

- 10,000,000 people without enough to eat,

- 18,000,000 without access to clean water, and

- more than 1,000,000 children under the age of 5, at risk of death from malnutrition.

It is Mr. Bush who is lawless. It is Mr. Bush who has upset order in the
world. It is Mr. Bush who is terrorizing Iraqi people with his plans for
war. It is Mr. Bush who has transformed this American democracy into a
rogue nation, willing to impose its will on the rest of the world.

The American people will not stand by while these denials and deceptions are
uttered by the White House. In thousands of cities across the nation,
including Eugene, ordinary citizens will take to the streets in the days to
come, continuing to show Mr. Bush and the world that we do not support
attacking another country with no provocation. We will not turn a blind eye
while Mr. Bush attempts to practice his denial and deception on us all.

The March 15th, 2003 Peace Rally & Unwarranted Police Responses

Press Release
For Immediate Release
March 18, 2003

Contact: Justice Not War Coalition, Steering Committee o. 343-8548
Amy Pincus Merwin o. 345-1633; cp 521-5062

Press Conference Scheduled to explore Eugene Police actions for Wednesday, March 19, 2003, 10am at the Eugene City office complex, Oak St. entrance stairs.

March 15th Peace Rally turned violent due to Eugene Police actions

Saturday, March 15, 2003 began with 5,000 or more Eugene and Lane County citizens marched peacefully in an unpermitted march from the UO's EMU to a permitted rally at the US Federal Courthouse on the corner of 7th and Pearl St.

The permitted rally, scheduled to occur between 1-5pm, focused on "A Celebration of Life" in opposition to the imminent war on Iraq, flowed smoothly for one and a half hours despite difficult weather conditions. Music buoyed the protesters moods, while speakers from community groups informed people as how to get involved to stop the war and support our community.

The large mass of people spilled over into 7th and Pearl streets from the Federal Courthouse Plaza, but the police and Eugene Department of Public Works had closed off the blocks between High and Oak on 7th St. as a matter of their own choice, without either requests or input from rally organizers. As a matter of fact, those blocks remained closed before, during and after the March 15th march and rally.

At approximately 2:30pm a small group of approximately 100 people, who remained at the rally after several downpours, began to walk. Neither these walkers intent, nor their destination was ever delineated. According to many citizen observers, the Eugene Police suddenly and shockingly drove five to six vehicles into the west section of the 7th and Pearl intersection with their sirens blaring and their lights flashing. At the same time many people who had been in the street block section of 7th between Pearl and High as a part of the rally were caught between police vehicles on the west end of the block and an EPD cordon on the east end of the same block.

According to citizen accounts, the EPD began amplifying their message to disperse which was inaudible to the protesters due to the weather, and the music and speakers from the stage. In fact, one of the rally organizers and MC, from UO Students for Peace, was called by the EPD, but could not answer her phone because she was too busy reacting to the incident unfolding before her. Another rally organizer and MC, from UO Students for Peace was approached by an Eugene Police Officer and told that the Eugene Police wanted the rally stopped and shut-down and made a reference to the possible use of tear gas.

Then the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team arrived in full riot gear and began to approach protesters still in the street. In contradiction to the EPD press release dated 3/15/03, no "admonishments were made by people associated with the rally to exit the streets with their PA system" to the rally attendees, nor was "the initial rally over." The rally was scheduled to continue until 5pm with a legal permit.

Once the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team appeared on the scene, as witnessed from a citizens' video of the event, people who had been in the streets as a part of the rally began to react to the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team's very intense presence by staying in the streets. Subsequently, Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team began without provocation to shoot beanbags at protesters, and wave their weapons at people in the crowd who were in shock, including parents with young children, seniors and youth, and people standing just off the sidewalk. Then the crowd began to react even more to the provocation of the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team and several young people between the ages of 15- and 21-years old, clasped hands and sat down in the street. These seven people were arrested, removed from the scene, taken several blocks away where they were told to sit in wet areas (and subsequently became soaked), ticketed, and relea
sed.

Representatives from the Eugene Police Department met with the Peacekeepers on Sunday, March 16 and again on Monday, March 17, 2003. Several participants have reported that: 1) the EPD representatives told them that the EPD was understaffed; 2) they chose to demonstrate a 'use of force' in order to shock, awe and control the crowd; 3) the outcome was not their intended not desired outcome; 4) that they were concerned about the bridges being filled with marchers; and 4) they have come close to admitting that they over-reacted to the events on March 15th.

Ironically, on both February 15, and March 15, 2003 the EPD chose to act aggressively toward protesters because of their assumption that protesters were heading to and would attempt to close down the Washington/Jefferson Bridge and the Ferry St. Bridge respectively. There is not any indication that on either days of protest that protesters intended to close down any bridges in Eugene.

It is clear from both the citizen video and citizen accounts that the Eugene Police Department's Crowd Control Team acted aggressively, aggravating a peaceful situation, scaring law-abiding citizens, attempting to shut-down a lawful and permitted 'right of assembly' event, provoking a reaction from the crowd who for all extensive purposes thought the street was closed off for the purpose of the march and rally, injured innocent people with the 'use of force' by shooting bean bags at individuals, and evoked all the subsequent problems, including reinforcing an image that Eugene's protest events are violent.

Justice Not War Coalition condemns the Eugene Police Department's decisions and actions on March 15, 2003 and will pursue making formal complaints to the Eugene Human Rights Commission, Eugene Police Commission, and the Eugene City Council.

Please contact the Justice Not War Coalition with any further questions or inquiries.


 

Justice Not War Coalition
30 East Broadway
Suite # 151
Eugene, OR 97401
541-521-0596
jnotwar@efn.org

To volunteer, contact Rich: 541-521-0596 / volunteer@justicenotwarcoalition.org

"In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law ... That would lead to anarchy. An individual who breaks a law that his conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.